
Telemarketers
and other thoughts about personal privacy.
As of the writing of this, CNN had just reported that new technology has been released
that will thwart the new anti telemarketing device known as the
"Telezapper" as well as other privacy/call blocking systems provided
by the phone companies. This new technology also has the ability to
display custom sales pitches on someone's caller ID display. I've
heard both sides of the argument and I know what the first amendment
says. However, I also believe in the right to personal privacy and we
already have similar laws where the 4th amendment is concerned. i.e.
You can't cross the front door of a person's house to search it
without a warrant, but you can stand on the side walk and look at the
front yard, searching for evidence without a warrant.
To resolve this issue, there needs to be established a clear, legal
"zone of privacy" for all citizens. Crossing that line would
constitute a new form of trespassing that we can call "commerce
trespassing". That line that determines the outer limit of this "zone
of privacy" would be drawn at my phone (cellular or otherwise) and my
mailbox. Unsolicited flyers in my mailbox would violate my "zone of
privacy". Calls to my telephone from telemarketers would violate my
"zone of privacy". I do not believe that the first amendment allows me
to walk into your house and into your living room to speak to you
without having been invited to do so. Similarly, my phone is in my
house or in my pocket and well within my "zone of privacy". What to
do? Establish a clear, legal "zone of privacy" for all citizens and
require that telemarketers have a written request for solicitation
(bearing an expiration date) from every single person they call.
There is a thing called an "Opt-out" list which has been tried many times without much
success. An "Opt-out" list is a list of names of persons who do not want to receive calls,
mailings or whatever anyone else wants to send them. Visa versa, an "Opt-in" list is a list of
people who like junk mail and spam and actually intend to buy that crap. There should not be
"Opt-out" list because that should be the *default*. Opt-out lists are a huge burden
to maintain and expensive. Who pays for Opt-out lists? Those of us who don't want to
receive junk mail and phone calls pay for it. Instead, the burden and expense of list
maintenance
should fall on the telemarketing industry. Not Opt-out list maintenance but rather Opt-in.
It would work like this. Any person who wishes to receive spam and junk mail fills out a
certificate (standardized letter,I'll be happy to design it) bearing an expiration date not to
exceed one year. Telemarketers can maintain duplicate and distribute these certificates
amongst themselves. No telemarketer may place a call without a physical copy of this
certificate in hand. The exparation date allows the person to change their mind after that
year is up. Any telemarketer who forges or alters a certificate, looses their business
license.
Now, I know that any telemarketing industry executive who hears of this plan will scream
bloody murder and talk about how it will undermine his/her livelyhood and that he /she has to
feed his/her children... blah blah blah... Whatever! I say to them that they are not a
legitimate business if they are going to violate the personal privacy of others. Just because
I have a phone doesn't mean that you or anyone else automatically has a right to call my
number. It's my phone, I pay for it, I give the number to those whom I wish to receive
calls from. My phone is there for MY convience, not yours, you telemarketer scum!
HOME |
BLAH BLAH BLAH |
VIDEOS |
GUNS |
WINE CELLAR |
JOKES |
MUSIC |
STUFF
E-MAILS FROM YOU |
WHO'S IN CHARGE HERE!? |
LINKS |
Original content, © Copyright 2000-2008 Cherrycheesecake.com All rights reserved.
Duh... this is stuff I thunk up all by myself.
© Copyright 2000-2003 Danny Boes. All rights reserved.
Opinions expressed are that of my own. So don't try to hold anyone else liable for them.